Visit the C-SPAN Mobile Site

Congress, Politics, Books
and American History

@cspan  
American History TV

Supreme Court Releases Arguments in FCC v Fox Television

Washington, DC
Friday, January 13, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court released the oral argument in FOX Television v FCC, a broadcast indecency case. The high court met on Tuesday, Jan. 10, to review a 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals decision that found the FCC's indecency rules unconstitutionally vague.

The case stems from the use of expletives by actresses Cher and Nicole Richie during the 2002 Billboard Music Awards, which aired on Fox.

This is the second time that the justices have heard the case. In an earlier decision, they ruled in favor of the FCC's decency rules, but referred the case back to the lower court to decide on the constitutionality of the FCC's guidelines that limit foul language and nudity on the network airwaves.

Updated: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 at 12:36pm (ET)

Related Events

C-SPAN Radio's Supreme Court Historic Oral Argument: “FCC V. Pacifica Foundation” (1978)
Friday, December 16, 2011     Washington, DC

On C-SPAN Radio’ s historic Supreme Court Oral Argument this week:

Legal Scholars Examine the Role of Courts in Democracy
Tuesday, May 1, 2012     Washington, DC

The Wilson Center hosted a discussion Tuesday on the role of U.S. courts in democracy.

Tribute to Former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor
Saturday, April 28, 2012     Washington, DC

Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was nominated by President Reagan in 1981, and served on the Court for twenty four years before retiring in 2006.  Recently she and three current U.S. Justices - Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan -shared stories of the confirmation process and their time on the Court, and talked about how life and work, especially for women, has changed over thirty years.  The Supreme Court Historical Society and the Freedom Forum co-hosted this event.

Supreme Court Oral Argument on Arizona’s Immigration Law
Friday, April 27, 2012     Washington, DC

Friday, the Supreme Court released audio from Wednesday's oral argument in Arizona v. U.S., an immigration case that pits Arizona’s state powers against the federal government.

Supreme Court Oral Argument on Arizona’s Immigration Law
Wednesday, April 25, 2012     Washington, DC

Today, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. U.S., an immigration case that pits Arizona’s state powers against the federal government. This Friday, C-SPAN will air the oral argument.

Republican Lawyers Host National Policy Conference
Friday, April 20, 2012     Washington, DC

A look at the record of Attorney General Eric Holder and a keynote speech from the lawyer who argued against "Obamacare" before the Supreme Court round out this year's conference on "Restoring a Government of Laws."

C-SPAN Radio's Supreme Court Historic Oral Argument: “De Canas v. Bica” (1976)
Friday, April 13, 2012     Washington, DC

On April 25, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the oral argument in “Arizona v. United States”— a high-profile case about the constitutionality of state laws that control the work and movement of undocumented immigrants living within the state.

Women Justices Mark 30th Anniversary of Sandra Day O’Connor’s First Term
Wednesday, April 11, 2012     Washington, DC

All four current and former female Supreme Court Justices celebrated the 30th Anniversary of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's first term on the Court.

C-SPAN Radio's Supreme Court Historic Oral Argument: “Kimbrough v. United States” (2007)
Friday, April 6, 2012     Washington, DC

On April 17, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the oral argument in “Dorsey and Hill v. United States”—a consolidated case about the application of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 to all those sentenced after the law was enacted.

Is the Law’s Expansion of Medicaid Coverage an Unconstitutional Intrusion on States?
Wednesday, March 28, 2012     Washington, DC

The final question today before the Supreme Court is whether the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of the Medicaid program violates the Constitution. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that it did not. 

Share This Event Via Social Media
C-SPAN Radio's iPhone & BlackBerry App